Lx, Yx, and Tx scaling relations (at R500)
New Modules:
-
Lx-M500 Bolometric -
Lx-M500 ROSAT -
Lx-Tx ROSAT -
Lx-Tx ROSAT (core-excised) -
Lx-Mstar (from BCG) -
Yx-M500 (Yx = Tx * Mgas)
for Lx, Tx: "core-excised" toggle switch (on by default)
References:
- Bahamas:
- Fig 16:
-
M500-Lx -
Lx-Tx (0.5-2keV)
-
- Fig 17:
-
M500-Yx
-
- Fig 16:
- TNG Cluster (Nelson)
- Fig 10:
-
M500-Lx (0.5-2kev) -- no fit available
-
- Fig 11:
-
Mstar-Lx (0.5-2kev)
-
- Fig 10:
- Flamingo (Braspenning) (0.5-2.0keV band)
- Fig 2:
-
Lx-Tx -
Lx-M500 -
Tx-M500
-
- Fig 2:
- MTNG (Pakmor)
- Fig 5:
-
Lx-M500 (bolo)
-
- Fig 5:
- LoCuSS (Mulroy)
- Table1 + Table 2 for M500, Mgas, Lx, YX, ...
- Eq 16 (fitting formula)
Original note
Note all plots probably should have a "core-excised" toggle switch for measurement. Where most likely we keep it on I think. Lx either bolometric or rosat Bahamas Fig 16 is ROSAT band, Nelson (TNG) Fig 10 is ROSAT band Flamingo Fig 2 is ROSAT as well (and they have LX vs Tx in there too) Figure 11 in Nelson also has I think L500 vs Mstar (which I assume is the BCG) [they also have figure 15 which is nice too for BCG halo mass relation which we might also want to add]
Pakmore (Mill TNG) Fig 5 top right uses Core-excised Bolometric Luminosity with Mulroy 2019 obseravtional data which does the same.
Yx is measured in Mulroy 2019 for observations and is just the product of the gas mass and the Temp, In that case temp is Tx, which I also assume is the emission weighted (core-excised) (that is for sure what bahamas does) Bahamas paper Fig 16 and 17 measure Yx.
Note in general the Mulroy 2019 paper has observational data on Lx bolometric, YX and Y500 as well.